Mass Appeal?
I have had occasion to expose myself to talk radio this week. It was a reminder of why I don’t listen to talk radio - or watch television regularly, or otherwise expose myself to much Mass Media. What seems to appeal to most people and give them a sense of solidarity and cohesion is simply irrational, irritating and insulting to me.
And it’s not about Liberal/Conservative opinion. I discredit anybody who publicly resorts to defamatory language to push a point across. If it’s a good solid point you don’t need to verbally assault your opponents on a personal level to make that point. Doing so says a lot more about the speaker’s confidence and credibility than whomever he/she is ripping on. It makes the speaker look bad. And it makes those associated with the speaker look bad. That’s an appeal to the lowest common denominator.
I despise bashing equally from the Conservative right-wing press as when I read it in the LGBT community and in other hyper-Liberal venues. Liberals deride the Conservative Right for being abusive, childish, reactionary and venomous (which they tend to be), but don’t see how abusive, childish, reactionary and venomous their own public arguments are. Look in a mirror, eh?
Oh, and please refrain from overstatement and exaggeration, people. If it’s a good solid premise it doesn’t need to be embellished or expanded upon; it will stand on its own. If it doesn’t make the point then you don’t have a point to begin with. Making a big deal of a little one is an impotent act of desperation and functionally minimizes the effect you are trying so hard to maximize; it produces the opposite of the desired effect and therefore undermines the validity of your argument.
Admittedly, in one-to-one conversation I can be as cutting as any shock jock in my verbal evaluation (ie evisceration) of someone I don’t like or with whom I vehemently disagree; that is a private, isolated and selective communication. Venting is healthy and it feels good - in private. In contrast, broadcasting and public speaking impact a huge audience of often unstable and uneducated people who are highly suggestible and will act on whatever they hear. Mass communication carries with it a responsibility that is different than you and I talking together. And by the way, that warm fuzzy little online social network you like to spew in to all your friends? You might want to remember that your postings are immediately available on the internet and open to anybody in the world to read (it’s also not that hard to join any passworded online discussion group as a spy, a voyeur or a troll).
So I am that guy who occasionally reaches my limit of tolerance with my self-appointed spokesfolk and fellow travelers, and posts in the middle of an online bash-match that the bashing is unacceptable, it misrepresents me as a part of that group, and it is embarrassing behavior for mature adults to indulge in publicly. I’m not real popular with a lot of people online sometimes. I take the fun out of feeling absolutely right through the insular coziness of peer reinforcement.
Yeah, Don’t Care. Just don’t make me look bad by showing your ass in public purportedly on my behalf.
Alternately, as readers and listeners, please don’t judge an entire interest group by some of the people who propose to represent that group. Even the most established figureheads often are truly an embarrassment to the people they pretend to speak for. It’s so much easier to knee-jerk, react and judge on the first thing you see - but it’s often a wrong impression.
Finally, I want to thank those few people - whatever you believe in and whatever views you espouse - who do show a clear, bright, articulate and informed public face with propriety, integrity, intelligence, restraint and confidence. You I will listen to thoughtfully and, even if I disagree, I will consider your point of view and broaden my understanding as a result.